[Simh] Testing 1,2,3

[Robert Jarratt]

Well said.

 

Personally I am ambivalent about top and bottom posting. If you have not
been following a thread and decide later that you want to read it, then
bottom posting is easier to follow. If you have been actively following a
thread then I think top posting is easier because you can see the next post
straight away without having to scroll all the way to the bottom every time
there is a new post.

 

Regards

 

Rob

 

From: simh-bounces at trailing-edge.com [mailto:simh-bounces at trailing-edge.com]
On Behalf Of Peter Moreton
Sent: 23 October 2008 08:46
To: simh at trailing-edge.com
Subject: Re: [Simh] Testing 1,2,3

 

I think we all 'get it' -  its just that some of us don't agree. There is
room on the internet for us all, and all or quirks and differences of
viewpoint. There is no right or wrong way to make a posting, just some
alternate ways!




  _____  

> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:52:42 +0200
> From: ante at Update.UU.SE
> To: Ken.Cornetet at kimball.com
> CC: simh at trailing-edge.com
> Subject: Re: [Simh] Testing 1,2,3
> 
> 
> You just don't get it, do you?
> 
> /a
> 
> -- 
> A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
> _______________________________________________
> Simh mailing list
> Simh at trailing-edge.com
> http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

  _____  

Read amazing stories to your kids on Messenger Try it
<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/115454060/direct/01/>  Now!

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/pipermail/simh/attachments/20081023/658e3ef5/attachment-0003.html>