[Simh] VUPs?
John H. Reinhardt
johnhreinhardt at yahoo.com
Fri Apr 4 11:43:53 EDT 2008
Norman Lastovica wrote:
> in at least one case that I can think of, a VAX was purposefully slowed
> down in the microcode. that is, at least, the rumor while I worked there.
> I'll bet Bob Supnik has some insight and stories along these lines.
>
> Care to share Bob?
>
I'm not Bob, but from things that I've read I believe that it's the VAX
8600 and 8650 that you're thinking of. The tale is that the 8600
microcode had a multitude of NOPs which were removed for the 8650 and
were responsible for a large portion of it's speed increase. IIRC the
claim was that the NOPS were used much like NULs after carriage return
characters in the old teletypes - i.e. to create a certain amount of
slack time to allow hardware operations to finish (or something similar).
John H. Reinhardt
More information about the Simh
mailing list