<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26-Jan-18 15:12, Johnny Billquist
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:c0b897e1-58d7-0345-5ce7-19ffe57a6459@softjar.se">On
2018-01-26 20:26, Clem Cole wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<br>
<br>
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Johnny Billquist
<<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:bqt@softjar.se">bqt@softjar.se</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:bqt@softjar.se"><mailto:bqt@softjar.se></a>> wrote:
<br>
<br>
<br>
Right. As far as I know, BLISS-16 only ran under VMS.
<br>
<br>
Hmm I'd be careful here. As I understand it, Hobbs has
implied they did the work on the 10 to start with because at the
time TLG was using PDP-10s. As one of the language designers,
I'd believe him. That said, what saw the light of day as
product I can not say, I was not paying attention to that in
those days. Phil or Tim might know.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Looked around some more, and it seems both BLISS-16 and BLISS-32
could be run under the PDP-10. Oh well. Never seen or heard about
that in real life, but I guess it must have existed at one point
then.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
I used both in real life. <br>
<br>
I don't believe either was released externally.<br>
<br>
BLISS would have done better in the outside world, except for the
DECision to price it higher than the market would bear.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:c0b897e1-58d7-0345-5ce7-19ffe57a6459@softjar.se"> Johnny
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>