[Simh] Simh and OpenVMS Integrity V8.4 Network Support issues

Maurizio De Tommaso (Gmail) maurizio.detommaso at gmail.com
Fri Mar 30 15:54:19 EDT 2012


Hi Mark,

First of all thank you so much for your prompt reply.

>>>1) You are running everything (the build) from an account with full 
>>>privileges enabled (needed to load >>>   the PCAP execlet), right?

Yep, from SIMH full privileges enabled account :

UAF> sho simh

Username: SIMH                             Owner:  Simh Manager
Account:  HISTORY                          UIC:    [121,1] ([HISTORY,SIMH])
CLI:      DCL                              Tables: DCLTABLES
Default:  SYS$SYSDEVICE:[simh381]
LGICMD:
Flags:
Primary days:   Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri
Secondary days:                     Sat Sun
No access restrictions
Expiration:            (none)    Pwdminimum:  8   Login Fails:     0
Pwdlifetime:           (none)    Pwdchange:  29-FEB-2012 12:00
Last Login: 30-MAR-2012 20:21 (interactive),            (none) 
(non-interactive)
Maxjobs:         0  Fillm:      4096  Bytlm:      2000000
Maxacctjobs:     0  Shrfillm:      0  Pbytlm:           0
Maxdetach:       0  BIOlm:      1024  JTquota:      60000
Prclm:          20  DIOlm:      1024  WSdef:         8192
Prio:            4  ASTlm:       500  WSquo:        16384
Queprio:         0  TQElm:       400  WSextent:     32768
CPU:        (none)  Enqlm:     32767  Pgflquo:     2500000
Authorized Privileges:
  ACNT         ALLSPOOL     ALTPRI       AUDIT        BUGCHK       BYPASS
  CMEXEC       CMKRNL       DIAGNOSE     DOWNGRADE    EXQUOTA      GROUP
  GRPNAM       GRPPRV       IMPERSONATE  IMPORT       LOG_IO       MOUNT
  NETMBX       OPER         PFNMAP       PHY_IO       PRMCEB       PRMGBL
  PRMMBX       PSWAPM       READALL      SECURITY     SETPRV       SHARE
  SHMEM        SYSGBL       SYSLCK       SYSNAM       SYSPRV       TMPMBX
  UPGRADE      VOLPRO       WORLD
Default Privileges:
  ACNT         ALLSPOOL     ALTPRI       AUDIT        BUGCHK       BYPASS
  CMEXEC       CMKRNL       DIAGNOSE     DOWNGRADE    EXQUOTA      GROUP
  GRPNAM       GRPPRV       IMPERSONATE  IMPORT       LOG_IO       MOUNT
  NETMBX       OPER         PFNMAP       PHY_IO       PRMCEB       PRMGBL
  PRMMBX       PSWAPM       READALL      SECURITY     SETPRV       SHARE
  SHMEM        SYSGBL       SYSLCK       SYSNAM       SYSPRV       TMPMBX
  UPGRADE      VOLPRO       WORLD


>>> 2) please provide the simulator command file you are using for these 
>>> tests.

I built three directory structures :

sys$sysdevice:[simh381]

Config.txt;16
ka655.nvr;1
ka655x.bin;1            <--- from simh 3.8-1 distribution
ovmsvaxsys.dsk;1
private.dsk;1
VAX381-I64.EXE;1
vmb.exe;1               <--- from simh 3.8-1 distribution

simh> show xq eth
ETH devices:
  0  LL0 (VMS Device: _LLA0:)   <--- the network adapter used by OpenVMS 
Integrity protocols
  1  IE1 (VMS Device: _EIB0:)

$ Type Config.txt
set cpu 512m
set cpu conhalt
load -r ka655x.bin
attach NVR ka655.nvr
set telnet 5305
set TQ enable
set TS disable
set LPT enable
set RQB disable
set RQC disable
set RQD disable
set RL disable
set RY disable
set rq2 disable
set rq3 enable
set tq1 enable
set tq2 disable
set tq3 disable
set RL disable
set LPT disable
set TQ TK70
set rq0 ra92
attach rq0 ovmsvaxsys.dsk
set rq1 ra92
attach rq1 private.dsk
set xq  mac=08-00-2b-11-22-44
set xq type=delqa
attach xq eth0




sys$sysdevice:[simh382rc2]

Config.txt;16
ka655.nvr;1
ka655x.bin;1              <--- from simh 3.8-2 distribution
ovmsvaxsys.dsk;1
private.dsk;1
VAX382-I64.EXE;1
vmb.exe;1                 <--- from simh 3.8-2 distribution


sim> show xq eth
ETH devices:
  0  LL0 (VMS Device: _LLA0:)   <--- the network adapter used by OpenVMS 
Integrity protocols
  1  IE1 (VMS Device: _EIB0:)


$ Type Config.txt
set cpu 512m
set cpu conhalt
load -r ka655x.bin
attach NVR ka655.nvr
set telnet 5305
set TQ enable
set TS disable
set LPT enable
set RQB disable
set RQC disable
set RQD disable
set RL disable
set RY disable
set rq2 disable
set rq3 enable
set tq1 enable
set tq2 disable
set tq3 disable
set RL disable
set LPT disable
set TQ TK70
set rq0 ra92
attach rq0 ovmsvaxsys.dsk
set rq1 ra92
attach rq1 private.dsk
set xq  mac=08-00-2b-11-22-44
set xq type=delqa
attach xq eth0



sys$sydevice:[simh390rc1]

Config.txt;16
ka655.nvr;1
ka655x.bin;1              <--- from simh 3.9-0 distribution
ovmsvaxsys.dsk;1
private.dsk;1
VAX390-i64.EXE;1
vmb.exe;1                 <--- from simh 3.9-0 distribution

sim> show xq eth
ETH devices:
  0  LL0 (VMS Device: _LLA0:)   <--- the network adapter used by OpenVMS 
Integrity protocols
  1  IE1 (VMS Device: _EIB0:)


$ Type Config.txt
set cpu 512m
set cpu conhalt
load -r ka655x.bin
attach NVR ka655.nvr
set telnet 5305
set TQ enable
set TS disable
set LPT enable
set RQB disable
set RQC disable
set RQD disable
set RL disable
set RY disable
set rq2 disable
set rq3 enable
set tq1 enable
set tq2 disable
set tq3 disable
set RL disable
set LPT disable
set TQ TK70
set rq0 ra92
attach rq0 ovmsvaxsys.dsk
set rq1 ra92
attach rq1 private.dsk
set xq  mac=08-00-2b-11-22-44
set xq type=delqa
attach xq eth0


>>> 4) can you: 'attach xq eth0' or 'attach xq eth1'?

Both, I can attach eth0 and eth1


>>> 5) exactly what did you do when you 'tried to assign a mac address on 
>>> the device ETH0/1 without success'?

Even if I assign a MAC to the device ETH0 (or ETH1), the network continues 
to not work.

>>> 6) how are you observing 'performance' to say that one version is good 
>>> and one is unacceptable?

The simh V3.8-1 -> the emulated Vax boots in less than 3 minutes and in 
general the system response is very good.

The simg V3.8-2 and simh V3.9-0  -> the emulated Vax boots in about 10 
minutes. The system responses is not good; a dir of sys$manager, for 
example, gets 2 minutes before to show me its output. All is very slow, also 
when I digit the OpenVMS commands at the prompt.

Please, consider I use the same .dsk containers for the three simh 
environment, so the same software environment.

>>> 7) did you reboot the system between each of the below changes of 
>>> pcap-vms software?

Yes, of course.

I hope this helps.

Best regards,
/Maurizio


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm" <Mark at infocomm.com>
To: "Maurizio De Tommaso (Gmail)" <maurizio.detommaso at gmail.com>; "Mark 
Pizzolato - Info Comm" <Mark at infocomm.com>; "Matt" 
<scope.matthew at btinternet.com>
Cc: "Hittner, David T (IS)" <david.hittner at ngc.com>; "Simh Trailing-Edge 
Mailing List" <simh at trailing-edge.com>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 8:38 PM
Subject: RE: [Simh] Simh and OpenVMS Integrity V8.4 Network Support issues


Hi Maurizio,

So, no matter what you do, networking isn't working for you.  You no longer 
have crashes, rght?

Several things:
  1) You are running everything (the build) from an account with full 
privileges enabled (needed to load the PCAP execlet), right?
  2) please provide the simulator command file you are using for these 
tests.
  3) what does 'show xq eth' display?
  4) can you: 'attach xq eth0' or 'attach xq eth1'?
  5) exactly what did you do when you 'tried to assign a mac address on the 
device ETH0/1 without success'?
  6) how are you observing 'performance' to say that one version is good and 
one is unacceptable?
  7) did you reboot the system between each of the below changes of pcap-vms 
software?

The difference between the vms-pcap.zip code from Matt and from the github 
vms-pcap.zip should only be a few things which may remove compiler & link 
warnings on some OS and/or compiler versions.  I believe that both should 
work even when such warnings are produced.  If you're not getting 
compile/link warnings then there should be no functional difference.

I'm quite surprised to hear that you conclude that V3.8-1 runs acceptably 
fast and the latest versions don't run equally as fast.  There shouldn't 
have been any changes which caused this to happen.  Please answer the above 
questions and maybe something obvious will appear.  In any case once I see 
how you're measuring performance I'll repeat similar measurements here and 
look into what may cause it.

I look forward to your feedback.

- Mark

On Friday, March 30, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Maurizio De Tommaso wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I give you some update about my tests of the SIMH with network support
> under OpenVMS I64 V8.4 UPD600.
>
> 1) SIMH code V3.8-1 from simh site (http://simh.trailing-edge.com/) + PCAP
> form Mark site (https://github.com/markpizz/simh/downloads). I tested also
> the PCAP from Matt site (http://www.9track.net/simh/pcap. I tried also to
> assign a mac address on the devices ETH0/1  without success. The network
> doesn't work but the performance of the VM is very good.
>
> 2) Simh code V3.8-2rc2-170-g9449c1f + PCAP form Mark site
> (https://github.com/markpizz/simh/downloads). I tested also the PCAP from
> Matt site (http://www.9track.net/simh/pcap). The network doesn't work
> and the performance of the VM is very poor, not acceptable.
>
> 3) Simh code v3.9-0-rc1+ + PCAP form Mark site
> (https://github.com/markpizz/simh/downloads). I tested also the PCAP from
> Matt site (http://www.9track.net/simh/pcap). The network doesn't work
> and the performance of the VM is very poor, not acceptable.
>
> I repeat, It's very strange because with the rx2600,as you reported 
> before,
> you are able to work with the emulated network adapter without error
> (...but what about the SIM performace with the new code ?)
>
> As reported by Matt, perhaps it is something to do with the brand of the
> network cards ?
>
> Any hint will be appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> /Maurizio
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm" <Mark at infocomm.com>
> To: "Maurizio De Tommaso (Gmail)" <maurizio.detommaso at gmail.com>;
> "Matt"
> <scope.matthew at btinternet.com>; "Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm"
> <Mark at infocomm.com>
> Cc: "Hittner, David T (IS)" <david.hittner at ngc.com>; "Simh Trailing-Edge
> Mailing List" <simh at trailing-edge.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 11:06 PM
> Subject: RE: [Simh] Simh and OpenVMS Integrity V8.4 Network Support
> issues
>
>
> Hi Maurizio,
>
> On Saturday, March 24, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Maurizio De Tommaso wrote:
> > Thank you so much Mark and Matt for the update.
> >
> > I downloaded your two kits and I tested them (one at a time) with SIMH
> > V3.8-1 under OpenVMS V8.4 Update600 environment. I confirm you that
> > with these new two kits the CPUSPINWAIT crash seems to be gone.
> >
> > Unfortunally under the SIMH environment the network still doesn't work
> > (protocols used : SCS, Decnet, LAT  and  TCP/IP - all correctly
> > configured on
> > XQA: device). Basically, the same problems observed three weeks ago,
> > when I started my tests on this environment.
> >
> > It's very strange because with his rx2660, Mark is able to work with
> > the emulated network adapter without error. What am I doing wrong ?
>
> Actually my system is an rx2600.
>
> My testing covered all protocols.
>
> In my environment, I have a simh VAX instance running continuously.  This
> node is configured as a cluster boot server and I have a SIMH node defined 
> in
> the cluster with MAC address 08:00:2b:11:22:44.
>
> The host system (rx2600) is running OpenVMS 8.4 and is NOT a member of
> the cluster.
>
> The host system has 2 network interfaces, with both connected to the same
> switched network.
>
> sim> sh xq eth
> ETH devices:
>   0  IE0 (VMS Device: _EIA0:)
>   1  WE0 (VMS Device: _EWA0:)
>
> Using the configuration file you've got, with the MAC address on XQ set to
> 08:00:2b:11:22:44 I can attach to EITHER interface (eth0 or eth1) and the
> following will boot the system:
>       sim> b cpu
>       KA655-B V5.3, VMB 2.7
>       Performing normal system tests.
>       40..39..38..37..36..35..34..33..32..31..30..29..28..27..26..25..
>       24..23..22..21..20..19..18..17..16..15..14..13..12..11..10..09..
>       08..07..06..05..04..03..
>       Tests completed.
>       >>>b xqa0
>        (BOOT/R5:0 XQA0
>
>
>
>         2..
>       -XQA0
>         1..0..
>
>
>       %VAXcluster, system loaded from node VS4000 (AA-00-04-00-18-04)
>       [...]
>
> The cluster boot works, the booted system has DECnet, LAT and IP
> configured and all protocols work (except when I use the interface the 
> host is
> using for DECnet, LAT and IP I can't talk directly to the host, but I can 
> talk to
> other systems on the LAN)
>
> Things should work with your locally booted system as well.  You should be
> able to attach to eth0 (vs eth1) and talk to other systems on your 
> network.
> You may want to try using the same interface which the host system is 
> using
> (you would then be sure to be using a network interface which you are
> absolutely sure is working).
>
> There have been very significant changes to the simh networking code since
> simh v3.8-1, I'm running the new stuff.
>
> The simh vax code I'm running with can be found at
> https://github.com/markpizz/simh/zipball/master (Take what that URL
> returns and save it as a zip file).
> Move it to your VMS host machine in binary mode.
> Unpack it with these commands
>     $ unzip {zipfilename.zip}
>     $ set default [.directory-containing  scp.c]
>     $ set file/attri=RFM:STM makefile,*.mms,[...]*.c,[...]*.h,[...]*.txt
>
> Build it with:
>     $ mms vax
>
> Let me know where you get.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> > From Integrity side :
> >
> > SYSTEM_YODA > run SYS$SYSDEVICE:[SIMH]VAX-I64.EXE
> > sim> show xq eth
> > ETH devices:
> >   0  LL0 (VMS Device: _LLA0:)
> >   1  IE1 (VMS Device: _EIB0:) <-- I reserve this network adapter for
> > SIMH emulator !!!
> >
> > sim> set cpu 512m
> > sim> set cpu conhalt
> > sim> load -r ka655x.bin
> > sim> attach NVR ka655.nvr
> > sim> set telnet 5305
> > sim> set TQ enable
> > sim> set TS disable
> > sim> set LPT enable
> > sim> set RQB disable
> > sim> set RQC disable
> > sim> set RQD disable
> > sim> set RL disable
> > sim> set RY disable
> > sim> set rq2 disable
> > sim> set rq3 enable
> > sim> set tq1 enable
> > sim> set tq2 disable
> > sim> set tq3 disable
> > sim> set RL disable
> > sim> set LPT disable
> > sim> set TQ TK70
> > sim> set rq0 ra92
> > sim> attach rq0 ovmsvaxsys.dsk
> > sim> set rq1 ra92
> > sim> attach rq1 private.dsk
> > sim> set xq type=delqa
> > sim> attach xq eth1
> > sim> boot cpu
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From SIMH side :
> >
> >
> > LAN Data Structures
> > -------------------
> > LSB address  = A1C07580
> > Device state = 0013 Inited,Run,Timer
> >
> >                  -- XQA Unit Summary 24-MAR-2012 18:50:23 --
> >
> > UCB     UCB Addr  Fmt   Value           Client     State
> > ---     --------  ---   -----           ------  -----------
> > XQA0    A1BAFF00
> > XQA16   A1D3CE40  Eth   60-03           DECNET  0017 
> > Strtn,Len,Uniq,Strtd
> > XQA17   A1BB0180  Eth   60-01           MOPDL   001F
> > Strtn,Len,Uniq,Share,Strtd
> > XQA18   A1D37DC0  Eth   90-00           LOOP    001D
> > Strtn,Uniq,Share,Strtd
> > XQA19   A1C7D880  Eth   60-04           LAT     0015 Strtn,Uniq,Strtd
> > XQA20   A1C80300  Eth   08-00           IP      0015 Strtn,Uniq,Strtd
> > XQA21   A1C7F900  Eth   08-06           ARP     0015 Strtn,Uniq,Strtd
> > XQA22   A1C7EF00  Eth   86-DD                   0015 Strtn,Uniq,Strtd
> > XQA23   A1BBDF00  Eth   00-00                   0000
> > XQA24   A1C80D00  Eth   00-00                   0000
> >
> >
> > SYSTEM_SIMH> ifconfig -a
> > LO0:
> > flags=100c89<UP,LOOPBACK,NOARP,MULTICAST,SIMPLEX,NOCHECKSUM>
> >      inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 ipmtu 4096
> >
> > QE0: flags=c43<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,SIMPLEX>
> >      inet 192.168.1.8 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.1.63 ipmtu
> > 1500
> >
> >
> > SYSTEM_SIMH> ping 192.168.1.1 ! (the router) PING 192.168.1.1
> > (192.168.1.1): 56 data bytes
> >
> >
> > ----192.168.1.1 PING Statistics----
> > 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> > %SYSTEM-F-TIMEOUT, device timeout
> >
> > SYSTEM_SIMH> ping 192.168.1.5 ! (the Integrity Server) PING
> > 192.168.1.5 (192.168.1.5): 56 data bytes
> >
> >
> > ----192.168.1.5 PING Statistics----
> > 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> > %SYSTEM-F-TIMEOUT, device timeout
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From Integrity side :
> >
> > LAN Data Structures
> > -------------------
> >
> >                  -- EIB Device Summary 24-MAR-2012 18:51:45 --
> >
> > LSB address  = 9E81A000
> > Device state = 00003103 RUN,INITED,RING_AVAIL,FP_CPUAFF,AUTO_ENA
> >
> > UCB      UCB Addr  Fmt   Value           Client     State
> > ---      --------  ---   -----           ------  -----------
> > EIB0     8E266D00
> > EIB6     8ECFF640  Eth   00-00                   0000
> > EIB12    8E924B80  Eth   60-06           USER    0015 STRTN,UNIQ,STRTD
> >
> >
> > SYSTEM_YODA >ifconfig -a
> > LE0: flags=c43<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,SIMPLEX>
> >     *inet 192.168.1.5 netmask ffffffc0 broadcast 192.168.1.63 ipmtu
> > 1500
> >
> > LO0:
> > flags=100c89<UP,LOOPBACK,NOARP,MULTICAST,SIMPLEX,NOCHECKSUM>
> >      inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000 ipmtu 4096
> >
> >
> > SYSTEM_YODA >ping 192.168.1.8 ! (the simh Ip address) PING 192.168.1.8
> > (192.168.1.8): 56 data bytes
> >
> >
> > ----192.168.1.8 PING Statistics----
> > 4 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss
> > %SYSTEM-F-TIMEOUT, device timeout
> >
> >
> >
> > It is very interesting to observe that the LAT protocol behaves
> > differently (Incoming and Outcoming connection are enabled on both
> > nodes - rx1600 and SIMH ) :
> >
> > SYSTEM_SIMH> mc latcp sho service
> >
> > Service Name      Status       Identification
> 
> >  ----------------  -----------  -------------------------------------------------
> > SIMH              Available    @SYS$MANAGER:ANNOUNCE.COM
> > VAX_SIMULATOR     Available    SIMH-Vax running on rx1620 & OpenVMS
> > V8.4
> >
> >
> > SYSTEM_YODA >mc latcp sho service
> >
> > Service Name      Status       Identification
> 
> >  ----------------  -----------  -------------------------------------------------
> > JEDY              Available    OpenVMS Alias Name Cluster
> > SIMH              Available    @SYS$MANAGER:ANNOUNCE.COM
> > VAX_SIMULATOR     Available    SIMH-Vax running on rx1620 & OpenVMS
> > V8.4
> > YODA              Available    @SYS$MANAGER:ANNOUNCE.COM
> >
> >
> > SYSTEM_YODA >set host/lat VAX_SIMULATOR %LAT-F-PROTERR,
> communication
> > protocol error -LAT-I-END, control returned to node YODA
> >
> > SYSTEM_YODA >set host/lat simh
> > %LAT-F-PROTERR, communication protocol error -LAT-I-END, control
> > returned to node YODA
> >
> > It seems that LAT protocol under SIMH is able to transmit but it is
> > not able to receive :
> >
> > EIB12   8E9279C0  Eth   60-06          USER  0015 STRTN,UNIQ,STRTD
> > (Integrity Server)
> > XQA11   A1D50080  Eth   60-04          LAT   0015 Strtn,Uniq,Strtd 
> > (Simh)
> >
> >
> > Any hint will be appreciated.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > /Maurizio
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Matt" <scope.matthew at btinternet.com>
> > To: "Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm" <Mark at infocomm.com>
> > Cc: "Maurizio De Tommaso (Gmail)" <maurizio.detommaso at gmail.com>;
> > "Hittner, David T (IS)" <david.hittner at ngc.com>; "Simh Trailing-Edge
> > Mailing List"
> > <simh at trailing-edge.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 10:37 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Simh] Simh and OpenVMS Integrity V8.4 Network Support
> > issues
> >
> >
> > > On 22/03/2012 20:42, Mark Pizzolato - Info Comm wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Well, I looked into this.  I've got an rx2600 recently acquired
> > >> cheap on eBay.  I updated the firmware on this system to the latest
> > >> before installing VMS and doing any testing.
> > >>
> > >> I started with the vms-pcap.zip downloaded from:
> > >> https://github.com/markpizz/simh/downloads
> > >>
> > >> Everything worked as expected.  No crashes and full Ethernet 
> > >> behavior.
> > >>
> > >> I then took the vms-pcap.zip from http://www.9track.net/simh/pcap
> > >>
> > >> I expected these to be the same since I worked with Matt last year
> > >> when I picked up his fixes and merged them into the code on github.
> > >>
> > >> They were not the same.  The code from
> > http://www.9track.net/simh/pcap
> > >> produced the crashes which Maurizio described.
> > >>
> > >> Looking for what was different, I compared the source.  The code on
> > >> github.com had a version of pcapvcm.c which had comments describing
> > >> it
> > as
> > >> Version X-3.  The code from 9track.net had comments describing it
> > >> as Version X-2.  There was also a difference in snprintf.c which
> > >> cleaned up compiler warnings on some platforms.  Additionally,
> > >> there were an extra file in the zip file from github.com called
> > >> 0readme_pcap-VMS.txt which describes the relative directory
> > >> structure the pcap-vms code should have with respect to the simh
> > >> source which references it (via simh's descrip.mms file).
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure why Matt's website has the older code in its zip file
> > >> since I got the code on github from Matt.  The right answer seems
> > >> to use the code from github.
> > >>
> > >> Meanwhile, I also looked at the libpcap provided with OpenVMS 8.4
> > TCP/IP
> > >> 5.7 ECO3.  This libpcap implementation does NOT have
> > >> pcap_sendpacket,
> > so
> > >> it won't be useful for simh networking.
> > >>
> > >> - Mark Pizzolato
> > >>
> > >>
> > > I know what's happened here. I recently had to move to a new server,
> > > due to disk problems and the website content was restored from the
> > > copy on my local system, which should have been up to date but
> > > clearly wasn't. I think I've uploaded the correct version now (it
> > > identifies itself as X-3). Sorry for any inconvenience this has 
> > > caused.
> > >
> > > Maurizio, does this fix the problems you were seeing?
> > >
> > > Matt
> >
>
>





More information about the Simh mailing list